Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court, Hon. Frances E. Bouck, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
Matt Kamby, defendant in error, (hereinafter designated as “Claimant”) was employed by plaintiff in error, The Colorado Mining and Development Company, in its mining operations, and plaintiff in error, The Globe Indemnity Company, was the insurer of the mining company. All were subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, chap. 179, Laws of 1915, p. 515. Claimant was injured on the 14th day of October, 1916, by a falling timber, which broke his left leg about two inches above the knee. The sole question for the determination of the commission was the extent and degree of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gillen's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Matter of Grammici v. . ZinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Duprey's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Passini v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Industrial Commission v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Byouk v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- American Metals Climax, Inc. v. CisnerosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Gerrard v. Harvey & Newman Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Womack v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Rio Grande Motor Way, Inc. v. De MerschmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.