Legal Opinion
Williams v. Brasea, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided December 18, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 69-C-213PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEALS, District Judge.
Bender Welding & Machine Co., defendant and cross-defendant in this action, has filed motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and to quash service, based on the contention that Bender is not amenable to service under the Texas long arm statute, Art. 2031b Vernon’s R.Civ.St., because the company failed to satisfy the “minimum contacts” requirement that has been grafted on to every state’s long arm statute by virtue of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, and the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in International Shoe v. State of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Hearne v. Dow-Badische Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1963
- Gill v. Fairchild Hiller Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. Brasea, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Reich v. Signal Oil and Gas Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
- Odom v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
- Chilean Nitrate Corp. v. M/V HANS LEONHARDTDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
- Williams v. BraseaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.