Legal Opinion
Gill v. Fairchild Hiller Corp.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 23, 1970No. 1:12-adr-00006PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
BOWNES, District Judge.
The motions are denied.
The complaint, as amended, alleges jurisdiction based upon NH RSA ch. 300 § 14 (1966) which provides:
Appointment of Process Agent by Foreign Corporation. If a foreign corporation makes a contract with a resident of New Hampshire to be performed in whole or in part by either party in New Hampshire, or if such foreign corporation commits a tort in whole or in part in New Hampshire against a resident of New Hampshire, such acts shall be deemed to be doing business in New…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Roy v. North American Newspaper Alliance, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- Grace v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Kenny v. Alexson Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Centronics Data Computer Corp. v. Mannesmann, A. G.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1977
- DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
- Miller v. Cousins Properties, IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.