Legal Opinion
Hearne v. Dow-Badische Chemical Company
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided December 10, 1963No. Civ. A. 2900PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOEL, District Judge.
This ease is before the Court upon the motion of defendant McCartney Manu- factoring Company, Ine. to quash service and to dismiss the complaint against it because of lack of jurisdiction. This defendant, a foreign corporation, will be referred to as McCartney.
The case involves a suit for damages for the death of Benny David Hearne brought by his widow, Carolyn Lyvonne Hearne, and his parents, Cleon J. Hearne and Opal M. Hearne, all of whom are hereinafter called plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs allege that decedent was employed by General Industrial Service, which had…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Product Promotions, Inc. v. Jacques Y. CousteauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Mary Jean Prejean v. Sonatrach, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Jetco Electronic Industries, Inc. v. GardinerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Milton Margoles, M.D. v. Alida JohnsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.