Legal Opinion
Reich v. Signal Oil and Gas Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 6, 1974No. Civ. A. 72-H-945, 72-H-864PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:
SEALS, District Judge.
The Court, having considered the Motions to Quash Service and Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction made by Defendants Bristow Helicopters, Ltd., (Bristow) and Construzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni Agusta (Agusta), hereby ORDERS:
The Motions are GRANTED.
These motions arise following a long series of discovery procedures going to the jurisdictional questions in this most complex and multi-faceted pair of cases. In brief, these causes of action are the result of a tragic accident resulting in the deaths of two men, one a Louisiana resident and one a Texas…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Product Promotions, Inc. v. Jacques Y. CousteauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Moki Mac River Expeditions v. DruggTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Johnston v. Multidata Systems International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Jones v. Petty-Ray Geophysical, Geosource, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Mary Jean Prejean v. Sonatrach, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Randall O. Walker v. Gale S. Newgent and General Motors Corporation and Its Opel Division, Its Subsidiary, Adam Opel, AgCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.