Legal Opinion

Intex Recreation Corp. v. Hasbro, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 20, 1998No. CV 96-0533 ABC (MCX)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER: Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Adjudication re:(i) Invalidity of Claim 12 of U.S. Patent No. 5,575,738;(ii) Invalidity of U.S. Design Patent No. D-366-085;(iii) Non-Infringement of U.S. Design Patent No. D-366-085; and Plaintiffs Motion for Bifurcation

COLLINS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Motions for Summary Adjudication re: (i) Invalidity of Claim 12 of U.S. Patent No. 5,575,738; (ii) Invalidity of U.S. Design Patent No. D-366-085; (iii) Non-Infringement of U.S. Design Patent No. D-366-085; and Plaintiffs Motion for Bifurcation came on regularly for hearing before this Court on January…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. 3 COM CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
  2. Derrith Watchman-Moore, et al. v. United States of America, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
  3. Sciara v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API