Legal Opinion
E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. 3 COM CORP.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 12, 2002No. C-00-2255-DLJPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JENSEN, District Judge.
Defendant 3Com, Inc. (“3Com”) has moved for summary judgment for literal non-infringement of the ’311 patent, owned by plaintiff E-Pass Technologies, Inc. (“E-Pass”). The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. Having considered the papers submitted, the record in this case, and the applicable law, the Court hereby DENIES plaintiffs motion and GRANTS defendant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background and Procedural History
This is a patent infringement case involving a single patent covering…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. 3com Corporation (Also Known as 3com, Inc.) and Palm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- E-Pass Technologies v. 3com Corporation (Also Known as 3com)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- LG Electronics Inc. v. Q-lity Computer Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
- B-K Lighting, Inc. v. Vision3 LightingDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013