Legal Opinion · Dissent

MacKe Co. v. Comptroller of Treasury

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 26, 1984No. 24, September Term, 1984Published

1DissentMurphy, Chief Judge

I dissent from that part of the majority’s holding that the paper plates, cups, bowls, hot food cups and lids (the paper products) are exempt from the use tax imposed by Maryland Code (1957, 1980 Repl.Vol.) Article 81, § 373(a).1

The Maryland Use Tax Act, codified as §§ ,372-401 of Art. 81, imposes

“[a]n excise tax ... on the use, storage or consumption in this State of tangible personal property ... purchased within or without this State____” (§ 373(a)).

The phrase “use, storage, or consumption” is defined in § 372(d) to mean

“the exercise by any person within this State of any right or power…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Comptroller of Treasury v. M. E. Rockhill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. Bouse v. HutzlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Burger King, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Comptroller of Treasury v. Aerial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API