Legal Opinion

ANDREW v. DEPANI-SPARKES

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 16, 2017Published

1Opinion of the Court

OSCN Found Document:ANDREW v. DEPANI-SPARKES

OSCN navigation

Home

Courts

Court Dockets

Legal Research

Calendar

Help

Previous Case

Top Of Index

This Point in Index

Citationize

Next Case

Print Only

ANDREW v. DEPANI-SPARKES

2017 OK 42

396 P.3d 210

Case Number: 114082

Decided: 05/16/2017

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Cite as: 2017 OK 42, 396 P.3d 210

BRANDON and DANIELLE ANDREW, as Guardians of B. A., a minor child, and individually, as her parents, Plaintiffs/Appellants,

v.

ELISA DEPANI-SPARKES, D.O., THE PHYSICIAN GROUP, PLLC, a/k/a OCCO HEALTHCARE NETWORK, and INTEGRIS AMBULATORY CARE CORPORATION d/b/a…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Quiet Technology DC-8, Inc., Quiet Technology, Inc. v. Hurel-Dubois UK LTD.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API