Legal Opinion
Mopaz Diamonds, Inc. v. Institute of London Underwriters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 1, 1993No. 92 Civ. 8375 (RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mopaz Diamonds, Inc. (“Mopaz”) has moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) to remand this action to the New York Supreme Court and for an order pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P. and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 awarding Mopaz attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in connection with this motion.
For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
The Parties
Mopaz is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York with its principal place of business in New York City.
The defendant, The Institute of London Underwriters (“Lloyds”), is a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leslie v. BancTec Service Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Sonnenblick-Goldman Co. v. ITT Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Agee v. Paramount Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Walker v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Greenberg v. ChrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.