Legal Opinion
Russell v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 25, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-446PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on Counts II through VII of plaintiff’s amended complaint. Having considered the motion and supporting affidavits, the opposition and supporting affidavits, the hearing held on September 5, 1990, and the reasons set forth below, the Court shall deny defendants motion with respect to Counts II and IV, and shall grant defendant’s motion with respect to Counts III, V, VI, and VII.
DISCUSSION
On July 2, 1987, The United States Department of Health and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. Local 201 Reinforcing RodmenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Gray v. Universal Service Administrative Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Siniscalchi v. Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Von Zuckerstein v. Argonne National LaboratoryDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- United Paperworkers International Union And Its Local 340 v. Specialty Paperboard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.