Legal Opinion
Cienega Gardens v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 12, 2003No. 02-5050PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
In this Fifth Amendment regulatory takings case, Plaintiffs Cienega Gardens, et al. (“the Owners”) appeal the United States Court of Federal Claims’ grant of summary judgment to the government. Cienega Gardens v. United States, No. 94-1C (Fed.Cl. Jan. 8, 2002) (order granting summary judgment). Specifically, the Owners contend that when Congress enacted the Emergency Low Income Housing Preservation Act of 1987, Pub.L. No. 100-242, tit. II, 101 Stat. 1877 (1988) (codified at 12 U.S.C. § 17151 note (1988)) (hereinafter “ELIHPA”), and the Low-Income Housing Preservation and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- A & D Auto Sales, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Norman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Chancellor Manor, Gateway Investors, Ltd., and Oak Grove Towers Associates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Huntleigh USA Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.