Legal Opinion

Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1995No. 9301-00574; CA A82220PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*162De MUNIZ, J.

Plaintiffs are the parents and personal representative of decedent, who was killed when he fell more than 400 feet while working inside the KGON tower. Defendant Day Management Corporation (DMC) was decedent’s employer, and defendant Day is the president of DMC.1 Plaintiffs brought this action alleging, inter alia, a claim of negligence against DMC, a claim under ORS 656.156(2) that DMC deliberately intended to produce decedent’s injury or death, and a claim against DMC and Day for violating Oregon’s Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO). ORS 166.715 etseq.

De…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Petro-Tech, Inc. v. Western Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Neher v. ChartierOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lusk v. Monaco Motor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Heikkila v. Ewen Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kotera v. Daioh International U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. American Federation of Teachers-Oregon v. Oregon Taxpayers United PACCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API