Legal Opinion
Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 22, 1995No. 9301-00574; CA A82220Published
1Opinion of the Court
890 P.2d 1004 (1995)
133 Or.App. 159
Virginia KILMINSTER, Curtis Irwin, Sr., and Curtis Irwin, Sr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Curtis Irwin, Jr. (the decedent), Appellants,
v.
DAY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation, dba Clackamas Communications, and Gordon Day, Respondents, and
KSGO/KGON, Inc., a Washington corporation; Motorola, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire, Inc., a Washington corporation, Defendants.
9301-00574; CA A82220.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted September 9, 1994.
Decided February 22, 1995.
Tom Steenson,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Joseph Rae v. Union Bank, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- B.F. Hirsch v. Enright Refining Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Brittingham v. Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Lloyd T. Danielsen v. Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Petro-Tech, Inc. v. Western Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.