Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bong v. Cerny

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 27, 1990No. 89-1915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

Edward and Nancy Bong appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint under the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law, ch. 135, Stats., against Technical Rubber Company, Inc. (Tech Rubber) and Larry Cerny. Tech Rubber manufactures tire repair supplies. It sells its products to "distributors." Cerny was a Tech Rubber distributor. Tech Rubber permits its distributors to use jobbers. The primary issue raised by the defendants' motion for summary judgment is whether Tech Rubber or Cerny is a "grantor" of a "dealership” to the Bongs under sec. 135.02, Stats. Given the undis puted facts, we conclude that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. State Bank of La Crosse v. ElsenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  4. American Motors Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Journal/Sentinel, Inc. v. PlevaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fortier v. Flambeau Plastics Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  2. Goossen v. Estate of StandaertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  3. Old Tuckaway Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of GreenfieldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  4. Praefke Auto Electric & Battery Company, Inc. v. Tecumseh Products Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. John Maye Company, Inc. v. Nordson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API