Legal Opinion

State Bank of La Crosse v. Elsen

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 24, 1986No. 84-1905PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

Francis and Martha Elsen appeal a summary judgment in favor of State Bank of La Crosse foreclosing a real estate security agreement on their home. We conclude that a genuine factual issue exists as to whether the terms of the security agree ment resulted from the mutual mistake of the parties or from the bank's misrepresentation of its contents. We therefore reverse.

Section 802.08, Stats., governs summary judgment. Its purpose is to determine whether a dispute can be resolved without a trial. Summary judgment methodology must be followed by both the appellate court and the trial court. In re…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Strid v. ConverseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Rollins Burdick Hunter of Wisconsin, Inc. v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lecus v. American Mutual Insurance Co. of BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Garrett Ex Rel. Kravit v. City of New BerlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. GODFREY v. Huntington Lumber & Supply CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Fortier v. Flambeau Plastics Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  3. Marian Hutter Owen v. Herbert Wangerin, Mary Wangerin, Dave ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Dorr v. Sacred Heart HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  5. Metropolitan Ventures, LLC v. GEA AssociatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API