Engelbertson v. Loan & Building Assn.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The respondents have moved to dismiss this appeal or affirm the judgment on the ground that the questions raised are without merit and so unsubstantial as not to require further argument. The action is one to quiet title and to set aside a sale under a trust deed. From a judgment in favor of the defendants the plaintiffs have appealed upon the grounds that the notice of default fails to comply with section 2924 of the Civil Code, the terms of the deed of trust were not complied with in that no notice was given by the beneficiary of the exercise of his option to accelerate the due date of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sargent v. ShumakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- R.G. Hamilton Corp., Ltd. v. CorumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Williams v. KoenigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Brennan v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- California Securities Co. v. GrosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Middlebrook-Anderson Co. v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Oller v. Sonoma County Land Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Peterson v. Corporation of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.