Legal Opinion

California Securities Co. v. Grosse

California Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1935No. L. A. No. 14373; L. A. No. 14374PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Motions have been made by plaintiff and respondent to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment in each of the above actions for foreclosure of mortgages on real property. Defendants Charles E. Grosse and Hester M. Grosse appealed on the ground that the prevailing economic depression made payment of their loan impossible, and therefore constituted the defense of impossibility of performance. It was further urged that plaintiff was estopped by reason of an alleged oral agreement of extension made by its officers. That the depression cannot constitute a defense to a foreclosure…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brennan v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garcia v. World Savings, FSBCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Loeb v. ChristieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Sutherland v. Barclays American/Mortgage Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Harrison v. HansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Engelbertson v. Loan & Building Assn.California Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API