Legal Opinion
Quinn v. Parke & Lacy Machinery Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1892No. 570PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, J.
On June 30, 1890, appellant entered into a written contract for the sale or lease of the machinery in controversy, with the firm of Humphrey & Hamilton. The following is the instrument executed:
“The Parke & Lacy Machinery Company, of Spokane Palls, lessors, hereby lease unto Humphrey & Hamilton, of Deer Park, Washington, lessee, the following property for the period of six (6) months from the 30th day of June, 1890: One Phoenix horizontal engine, class B, size 9-J-xl2, 2-i-inch steam pipe with bandwheel and flywheel of engine 1,231; one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Meeker v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Charles H. Dodd & Co. v. Bowles, Washington Territory1888
- De Saint Germain v. Wind, Washington Territory1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- Herring-Marvin Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Wittler-Corbin Machinery Co. v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Bennett Bros. v. TamMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Quinn v. Parke & Lacy Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Kidder v. Wittler-Corbin Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.