Legal Opinion

De Saint Germain v. Wind

Washington Territory

Decided February 4, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the District Court holding terms at Walla Walla. First District. Action to recover the possession of a billiard-table or its value. The opinion states the facts.

Read the full summary

Error to the District Court holding terms at Walla Walla. First District. Action to recover the possession of a billiard-table or its value. The opinion states the facts. The contract referred to therein was as follows:— “ This agreement, made the eighteenth day of October, 1882, between Jacob Strahle & Co., of the city and county of San Francisco, State of California, of the first part, and Charles Simpson, of the city and county of Walla Walla, Territory of Washington, of the second part, witnesseth, that the parties of the first part have let and leased unto the party of the second part…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Greene

This is an appeal in the nature of a writ of error to review the decision of the District Court in an action for the recovery of the possession of a billiard-table or the value of it. The cause was tried by the judge without a jury; after all the evidence was in, the judge, on •defendant’s motion, granted a judgment of nonsuit. It appears from the record that one Simpson received possession of the table from plaintiff in error, under and by virtue of a certain written contract between them, consisting of two parts, — a lease so called, and an agreement for sale; and that while the table was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cherry v. ArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Wittler-Corbin Machinery Co. v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Quinn v. Parke & Lacy Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Redewill v. GillenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API