People v. Ochoa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANELLA, J.
In the underlying action, appellant Jordy Ezequiel Ochoa was charged with possession of a firearm as a felon (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)(1)).1 Prior to his trial, he sought discovery under Pitchess v. Superior *667Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 [113 Cal.Rptr. 897, 522 P.2d 305] {Pitchess). After the jury in appellant’s first trial was unable to reach a verdict on the charge, the trial court declined to revoke appellant’s probation, and appellant was convicted of the charge after a second trial. Appellant contends that under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, the ruling on his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. QuartermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Austin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Law Office of Andrew S. Bisom v. HowellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2020
- People v. Ellis CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Harris CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.