Legal Opinion

People v. Ochoa

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 2011No. B218800PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J.

In the underlying action, appellant Jordy Ezequiel Ochoa was charged with possession of a firearm as a felon (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)(1)).1 Prior to his trial, he sought discovery under Pitchess v. Superior *667Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 [113 Cal.Rptr. 897, 522 P.2d 305] {Pitchess). After the jury in appellant’s first trial was unable to reach a verdict on the charge, the trial court declined to revoke appellant’s probation, and appellant was convicted of the charge after a second trial. Appellant contends that under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, the ruling on his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. QuartermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. Austin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Law Office of Andrew S. Bisom v. HowellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2020
  4. People v. Ellis CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Harris CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API