Legal Opinion

Law Office of Andrew S. Bisom v. Howell

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California

Decided June 29, 2020No. 6:14-ap-01070Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 FILED & ENTERED 3 JUN 29 2020 4 5 C CL enE tR raK l U D. iS st. r B icA t N ofK CR aU liP foT rC nY ia COURT BY c a r g i l l DEPUTY CLERK 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 RIVERSIDE DIVISION 13 14 In re: Case No.: 6:13-bk-29922-MH 15 NANCY ANN HOWELL Chapter: 7 16 Debtor Adv. No.: 6:14-ap-01070-MH 17 LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW S. BISOM & MEMORANDUM DECISION AND 18 EISENBERG LAW FIRM, APC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 v. 20 NANCY ANN HOWELL 21 Defendant 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 I. Background & Undisputed Facts 2 3 In…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API