People v. Austin

*781Richard Austin appeals an order finding him in violation of a special condition of parole (condition 25) restricting him from contacting the "crime victim(s)" in case No. SCE350433, specified as "

*732Lisa [H.] or Brent [M.]" According to Austin, a later order in case No. SCE350433 made clear that the "crime victim" in that case was Brent, not Lisa. He claims this order had a preclusive effect as to the meaning of parole condition 25, or at a minimum that condition 25 was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. Austin does not contend a properly worded no-contact condition restricting contact with…