Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Duluth Clinic, Ltd.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1983No. C6-83-289PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

This case involves a covenant not to compete between a medical subspecialist and the multispecialty corporate medical clinic with which he practiced. Appellant Dr. Richard Freeman raises important issues regarding the arbitrability of the covenant in question, the consideration necessary to support such a covenant, and the enforceability of the covenant as against public policy. We conclude that the parties did not agree to arbitrate the issue of consideration and that no consideration for the covenant not to compete existed. We reverse the decision below, which confirmed the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Davies & Davies Agency, Inc. v. DaviesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Runzheimer International, Ltd. v. David FriedlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Zellner v. Stephen D. Conrad, M.D., P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Bond v. CharlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Dalco Corp. v. DixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API