Runzheimer International, Ltd. v. David Friedlen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDavid T. Prosser, J.
¶ 1. This case is before the court on certification by the court of appeals pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.61 (2011-12).1 It requires us to examine the enforceability of a restrictive covenant signed by an existing at-will employee.
¶ 2. David Friedlen (Friedlen) had worked for Runzheimer International, Ltd. (Runzheimer) for more than fifteen years when Runzheimer required all of its employees, including Friedlen, to sign restrictive covenants. Runzheimer gave Friedlen two weeks to review the covenant, after which Friedlen was required to sign it or be fired. Friedlen chose to sign the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ilah M. Tinder v. Pinkerton SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Curtis 1000, Incorporated v. Roy H. Suess and American Business Forms, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- C.G. Schmidt Incorporated v. Permasteelisa North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Mecum v. Weilert Custom Homes, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Kathy Schwab v. Paul SchwabWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- CG Schmidt Inc. v. Permasteelisa North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
- Nevill v. Johnson Controls Int'l PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.