Legal Opinion
Marcus v. Department of Income Maintenance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 29, 1986No. 12561; 12635PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDannehy, J.
These two appeals arise from the same set of circumstances. The plaintiffs, Phyllis Marcus and Selma Anderson, are the conservatrices for their mother, Ida Betzes, an incapable person. In the first case they appealed to the Superior Court from a disallowance by the Probate Court for the district of New Haven of an item in their account in which they asked to be allowed a credit for unauthorized gifts of certain property which belonged to their ward and which they gave to themselves and various members of the ward’s family. The matter was referred to the Hon. *526Raymond J. Devlin, state trial…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Van Lare v. HurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gross v. RellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Murphy v. WakeleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Department of Social Services v. SaundersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In re Baby Z.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.