Legal Opinion
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Chung
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 16, 2021No. 4:19-cv-07562Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07562-PJH 8 Plaintiffs, 9 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF SEALING 10 WILSON CHUNG, et al., ORDERS AND GRANTING MOTION TO MAINTAIN SEAL ON NON-PARTY 11 Defendants. FOXCONN’S INFORMATION 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 169-1, 176, 177 13 Before the court is plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc., (“plaintiff”) motion for partial 14 reconsideration of the court’s December 21, 2020 order (Dkt. 168) granting in part and 15 denying in part plaintiff’s motions to seal. Dkt. 169-1. Also…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Home Ins. Co. v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015