Locke v. Pachtman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.
In this medical malpractice action, the trial judge granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiffs’ proofs. The Court of Appeals affirmed, finding that plaintiff had failed to make a prima facie showing of the standard of care related to defendants’ allegedly negligent conduct.
We affirm.
i
On August 5, 1981, plaintiff Shirley Locke underwent a vaginal hysterectomy with entocele and rectocele repair at the University of Michigan Hospital.1 The procedure was performed by defendant, Dr. Judith Pachtman, then a fourth-year resident in gynecology. Codefendant, Dr.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Jones v. PorrettaMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Beals v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Higdon v. CarlebachMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Cebula v. BenoitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Kambat v. St. Francis HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.