Legal Opinion

Locke v. Pachtman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1994No. 96046, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.

In this medical malpractice action, the trial judge granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiffs’ proofs. The Court of Appeals affirmed, finding that plaintiff had failed to make a prima facie showing of the standard of care related to defendants’ allegedly negligent conduct.

We affirm.

i

On August 5, 1981, plaintiff Shirley Locke underwent a vaginal hysterectomy with entocele and rectocele repair at the University of Michigan Hospital.1 The procedure was performed by defendant, Dr. Judith Pachtman, then a fourth-year resident in gynecology. Codefendant, Dr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lince v. MonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Jones v. PorrettaMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Beals v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Higdon v. CarlebachMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Cebula v. BenoitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kambat v. St. Francis HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API