Kambat v. St. Francis Hospital
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
In this medical malpractice action, an 18-by-18-inch laparotomy pad was discovered in the abdomen of plaintiffs’ decedent following a hysterectomy performed by defendant physician at defendant hospital. The question before us is whether plaintiffs were entitled to submit the case to the jury on the theory of res ipsa loquitur. Contrary to the trial court and Appellate Division, we conclude that the jury could have inferred negligence under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, and that defendants’ evidence of due care and alternative causes of the injury did…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Buckelew v. GrossbardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Haddock v. ArnspigerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- Morejon v. Rais Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Seavers v. Methodist Medical Center of Oak RidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- States v. Lourdes HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- James v. WormuthNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.