Legal Opinion

Alaska State Housing Authority v. Contento

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1967No. 729, 745PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBETT, Chief Justice.

The appellees John and Eleanor Con-tento were the owners of the Family Shoe Store, located in a building in Fairbanks which had been purchased by appellant Alaska State Housing Authority in connection with its downtown urban renewal project. According to appellant’s testimony, the appellees were dilatory in removing their merchandise from the premises, and because of this appellant’s demolition contractor was in the process of demolishing one portion of the building while ap-pellees were still engaged in moving their merchandise to new premises next door. Strained…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Gregory v. PadillaAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Thomson v. Wheeler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Palzer v. SERV-U-MEAT COMPANYAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whaley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. HageMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ware v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Howard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Associated Engineers & Contractors, Inc. v. H & W Construction Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API