Legal Opinion

Ware v. City of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1968No. 882PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBETT, Chief Justice.

Appellant’s complaint against the city of Anchorage for damages for an alleged false arrest and imprisonment was dismissed without prejudice upon his failure, as a nonresident, to provide an undertaking' to secure the payment of costs and attorney fees as provided for in AS 09.60.060. 1

Appellant contends that AS 09.60.060 is procedural in its nature; that since the Alaska constitution vests in the supreme court the right to “make and promulgate”' rules of procedure, the statute is invalid because under the constitution the legislature cannot “make” rules of procedure,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Szantay v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Channel Flying, Inc. v. BernhardtAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Allen v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. State v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Nolan v. Sea Airmotive, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API