Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1978No. 3089PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. RABINO WITZ, Justice.

After trial by jury, Jack Howard was found guilty of the crime of grand larceny. 1 The superior court ordered imposition of sentence to be suspended for a period of six months and Howard to be placed on unsupervised probation during that period. 2 Howard was also ordered to pay $1,000 in court costs and to make restitution to Alyeska Pipeline Service Company in the amount of $101.

In this appeal, Howard has advanced 11 separate specifications of error, the most significant of which attack…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Pistro v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Oksoktaruk v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. MyersAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Walker v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API