Legal Opinion

Potter v. Boisvert

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1953No. Civ. 8210PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

In 1936 Helen Potter, plaintiff and respondent herein, and Wilfred J. Boisvert, defendant and appellant, left their respective homes in the east and also their respective spouses and together journeyed to California. Here they lived together and held themselves out to the public as being husband and wife until 1948, when they separated. During the intervening years they ran a grocery store and there was acquired also a residence property in which they lived. Thereafter respondent, Helen Potter, brought an action against Boisvert to have it declared that the grocery business had been a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allstead v. LaumeisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Xydias v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Taylor v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeRosa v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Moriarty v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Aguayo v. AmaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Womack v. WomackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API