DeRosa v. Transamerica Title Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Plaintiff James A. DeRosa (DeRosa) appeals from a summary judgment entered in his action against respondents Transamerica Title Insurance Co. (Transamerica) and Gary S. Smolker (Smolker) for malicious prosecution. We conclude the trial court properly concluded there was no triable issue of fact concerning whether DeRosa was guilty of unclean hands and affirm the judgment.
Statement of Facts and Proceedings Below.
On March 7, 1979, Transamerica opened an escrow account for the sale of real property by DeRosa and a couple named Wolen to Marilyn Lapitan (Lapitan). A quitclaim…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Lackner v. LaCroixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Saldana v. Globe-Weis Systems Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Paper Savers, Inc. v. NacsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.