Legal Opinion

Dodge v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 17, 1927No. D-191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGjraham, Judge

The Ford Motor Company, a Michigan corporation, had in its treasury at the close of the fiscal year ended July 31, 1916, a large cash surplus. Plaintiffs’ testator, a stockholder, demanded that a portion of this surplus be distributed as dividends in addition to the regular dividend. The directors refused the demand, and the plaintiffs brought equitable action to compel the distribution. The circuit and supreme courts of Michigan decided that the action of the directors in refusing to make the distribution was arbitrary and exceeded their discretion, and ordered them to make distribution of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. v. HeroldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Continental-Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  2. Kales v. WoodworthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  3. Burnet v. North American Oil ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  4. Poste v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API