Legal Opinion

Kales v. Woodworth

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1929No. 5105PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

No> objections or exceptions were taken in the court below to the findings of fact, and the case before us presents only questions of law upon the facts found. It involves income taxes for the years 1917 and 1919. The facts relating to the two assessments are somewhat alike. Those pertinent to the earlier assessment will appear from the discussion of the later one.

On July 31 of 1916 appellant was the owner of 525 shares of the capital stock of the Ford Motor Company. That company had a surplus at that time of $111,960,907.53. Of this surplus $52,550,771.92 was in cash.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Mason v. RoutzahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Routzahn v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  5. Dodge v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schuckman v. RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. Loose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Kales v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  4. Gazette Pub. Co. v. SelfDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1952
  5. Continental-Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API