Poste v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtGRAham, Judge
The facts in this case are not disputed. The report of the commissioner was accepted by both parties.
The original brief of defendant was filed upon an erroneous construction of the statute involved. In its supplemental brief it changed its position, due to the decision in Mason v. Routzahn, decided by the Supreme Court on November 21, 1927, 275 U. S. 175, and the Bemis cases, 64 C. Cls. 457, 467, decided on January 16, 1928. Under .these decisions the tax paid by the plaintiff in accordance with the assessment by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was the tax due, and therefore plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edwards v. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Mason v. RoutzahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Dodge v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
- Bemis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928