Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Andrews

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Winborne, J..

Plaintiffs challenge, on this appeal, the correctness of the judgment from which appeal is taken, on several grounds. However, after careful consideration of each exception, we are constrained to hold that error of sufficient import to justify disturbing the judgment is not shown.

I. The first and second exceptions may he treated together. They relate (1) to the overruling of plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the report of the referee, and (2) to the submission of the first issue. It is contended that no issue was submitted in defendants’ exception on the finding of fact No. 5, —…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Cape Fear Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Booker v. Town of HighlandsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Lister v. . ListerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Brooks v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  5. Lister v. ListerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Pruett v. PruettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. McGowan v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Williams v. STATE HIGHWAY COM. OF NORTH CAROLINASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API