Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arrow Automotive Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1988No. 87-3105Published

1DissentHarrison L. Winter, Chief Judge

I agree with the majority that First National Maintenance Corp. v. NLRB, 452 U.S. 666, 101 S.Ct. 2573, 69 L.Ed.2d 318 (1981), is the controlling authority which governs our decision of this ease. Regrettably, however, we read First National to apply differently. I read the Supreme Court’s interpretation in First National of *233an employer’s duties to bargain to impasse under Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 61 Stat. 141, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158, to mandate enforcement of the Board’s order here. The NLRB’s finding that Arrow closed its Hudson, Massachusetts, facility due…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API