Legal Opinion · Dissent

Senate of the State of Cal. v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1999No. S083194Published

1DissentKennard, J.

I dissent.

I cannot join the majority in its hasty decision to declare invalid, and to remove from the March 2000 election ballot, an initiative measure, Proposition 24, for which more than a million California voters have signed petitions. Because this challenge to Proposition 24 presents issues that are close and difficult, and because there has been inadequate time to give these issues the thoughtful attention and deliberation they deserve, I have not attempted to determine whether Proposition 24 is valid or invalid. Rather, consistent with this court’s decision under similar circumstances…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API