Legal Opinion
King Bros., Inc. v. Utah Dry Kiln Company
Utah Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1968No. 10931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice.
This appeal is the sequel to King Bros., Inc., v. Utah Dry Kiln Company.1 Plaintiff sued to recover for the value of a furnace and appurtenances which it had furnished and a contractor had installed in the *45construction of a lumber-curing plant of the defendant, Utah Dry Kiln Company, near Panguitch, Utah. The action is based on the fact that the defendant in connection with building its plant failed to obtain the performance bond required by Secs. 14-2-1 and 14 — 2-2, U.C.A.1953, the pertinent language of which provides:
1. The owner of any interest in land entering…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rio Grande Lumber Co. v. DarkeUtah Supreme Court · 1917
- King Bros., Inc. v. Utah Dry Kiln CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Buehner Block Company v. GlezosUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- United States v. Certain Property Located in Borough of ManhattanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Cary-Lombard Lumber Co. v. PartridgeUtah Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Wagner Associates v. Hercules, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Iadanza v. MatherDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1993
- Harrison v. Spah Family LTDUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- King Bros., Inc. v. Utah Dry Kiln CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1968