Legal Opinion

King Bros., Inc. v. Utah Dry Kiln Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1968No. 10931Published

1Opinion of the Court

440 P.2d 17 (1968)

21 Utah 2d 43

KING BROS., INC., a corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

UTAH DRY KILN COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 10931.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 19, 1968.

Orville Isom, Cedar City, for appellant.

Ken Chamberlain, of Olsen & Chamberlain, Richfield, for respondent.

CROCKETT, Chief Justice.

This appeal is the sequel to King Bros., Inc., v. Utah Dry Kiln Company.[1] Plaintiff sued to recover for the value of a furnace and appurtenances which it had furnished and a contractor had installed in the construction of a lumber-curing plant of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Lumber Co. v. DarkeUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  2. King Bros., Inc. v. Utah Dry Kiln CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Buehner Block Company v. GlezosUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  4. United States v. Certain Property Located in Borough of ManhattanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  5. Cary-Lombard Lumber Co. v. PartridgeUtah Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API