Legal Opinion

King Bros., Inc. v. Utah Dry Kiln Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1962No. 9626PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff King Bros, sued for the reasonable value of materials supplied to Oregon Dryer Company, a contractor building a dry kiln plant for the defendant Utah Dry Kiln Company. There is no privity of contract between the plaintiff and defendant. The claim of liability is predicated upon the failure of the defendant property owner to require its contractor to furnish a performance bond as required by Sec. 14-2-1, U.C.A.1953, quoted below.

Defendant made a motion to dismiss on the ground that the complaint “does not state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted,”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris v. Farnsworth MotelUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Rio Grande Lumber Co. v. DarkeUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. HawthorneWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Crane Co. v. UTAH MOTOR PARK, INCORPORATEDUtah Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Penrod v. Nu Creation Creme, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bailey-Allen Co., Inc. v. KurzetCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Barrus v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Paul Mueller Co. v. Cache Valley Dairy Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API