Munoz v. Olin
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWMAN, J.
— Appellants are the City of Los Angeles and two arson investigators who shot and killed William Munoz in the early morning hours of May 19, 1973. Respondents are his widow and children, plaintiffs in this wrongful death action.
*631Several arson incidents involving commercial property in Munoz’ neighborhood had been reported. On the night of the shooting defendants Olin and Halstead were staking out the area as arson investigators for the city, with the status of peace officers (Pen. Code, § 830.3, subd. (k), now § 830.3, subd. (j)). They testified that they intentionally shot…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Toschi v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Hayes v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Chelsey Hayes v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Pool v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Brown v. RansweilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.