Clarke v. Prenger
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant physicians in a medical malpractice action. The sole issue presented is whether summary judgment was correctly issued on the basis that the affidavits of plaintiff’s expert witness were insufficient to demonstrate familiarity with the local standard of care, and whether plaintiff’s expert witness, not being board-certified in the same specialties as were the defendants, was not qualified to express an opinion as to the standard of care incumbent upon the defendant physicians. We reverse.
Since the question…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Radman v. HaroldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Fitzmaurice v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Pearson v. ParsonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Buck v. St. ClairIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Grimes v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Rhodehouse v. StuttsIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Newberry v. MartensIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.