Legal Opinion

Rhodehouse v. Stutts

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1994No. 19318PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case in which the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendant doctor. The trial court found that the doctor’s affidavit submitted by plaintiff was not admissible evidence under I.R.C.P. 56(e) because there was an insufficient foundation to show the doctor’s familiarity with the local standard of care. We affirm the decision of the district court.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff Cleon Rhodehouse (Rhodehouse) suffered a heart attack on August 9, 1987, and was treated by the defendant, Dr. B. Shields Stutts (Stutts), at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hecla Mining Co. v. Star-Morning Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. East Lizard Butte Water Corp. v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Pearson v. ParsonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Kozlowski v. RushIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Perry v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gem State Insurance v. HutchisonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kolln v. Saint Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Curlee v. Kootenai County Fire & RescueIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API