Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Prudential Lines, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1993No. 03187PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge.

In this personal injury action we decide whether plaintiffs-appellants, Clarence L. Hughes and Doris A. Hughes, can maintain a garnishment action against appellee American-Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association, Inc. (“American Club”), in order to collect a judgment against Prudential Lines, Inc. (“PLI”), on the basis of an indemnity insurance policy. The parties to the indemnity policy were PLI and American Club. The terms of the policy provided that only upon payment by PLI to an injured claimant would American Club become obligated to indemnify its insured,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. West v. MacMillan (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Barr v. General Accident Group Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Specialty Surfaces International, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Brown v. CandeloraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Budtel Associates, LP v. Continental Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Rahemtulla v. HassamDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Benevento v. Life USA Holding, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API