Legal Opinion

Specialty Surfaces International, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 8, 2010No. 09-2773PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Specialty Surfaces International, Inc. (“Specialty Surfaces”) and Empire and Associates, Inc. (“Empire”) (collectively, “Sprinturf’) appeal from a summary judgment entered by the District Court in favor of appellee Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”). The Court granted summary judgment after concluding that Pennsylvania law applied to the insurance coverage issue presented in this case and that Continental had no duty under Pennsylvania law to defend the appellants against claims asserted in a California lawsuit.

I. Facts and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner US, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Scott Hammersmith v. Tig Insurance Company (w.d. Of Pa. Civil Nos. 02-Cv-01829 & 03-Cv-01333)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Sapa Extrusions Inc v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. In re Takata Airbag Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  3. Westfield Insurance v. Bellevue Holding Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Republic Servs. of Pa., LLC v. Caribbean Operators, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. York International Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API