Legal Opinion

Metal Door & Trim Co. v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1934No. 23651PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

For convenience the parties hereto will be designated plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff, an Indiana corporation, made a contract with the defendant Dan Hunt, Si'., whereby it agreed for a consideration of $14,000 to manufacture, deliver, and erect in place certain elevator and other equipment, including doors, in what is known as the Hunt Building in Tulsa, Okla. Defendant paid $6,000 of the agreed consideration, and having refused to pay more, plaintiff brought this suit to recover the balance of $8,000 alleged to be due it, and to foreclose a lien upon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Caldwell v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. B. K. Sweeney Co. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. Ex Rel. Sringfield Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Wills v. National Mineral Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Electrical Equipment Company, Inc. v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Company, D/B/A Daniel Hamm CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  4. White River Limestone Products Co. v. Mo.-Pac. Rd.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Wilson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API