Legal Opinion
United States v. Kareem A. Nagib
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 6, 1995No. 93-4018PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.
I. JURISDICTION
The' defendant, Kareem Nagib, was convicted of drug trafficking on October 1,1990, but he failed to file a timely notice of appeal as required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b). See 936 F.2d 292, 295 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 950, 112 S.Ct. 399, 116 L.Ed.2d 349 (1991). Since Rule 4(b)’s time limit is jurisdictional, we dismissed his appeal. Id. Undeterred, Nagib filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, collaterally attacking the district court’s judgment of conviction. Nagib argued before the district court that he had been denied…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- John Castellanos v. United States of America, Kevin B. Streete v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Thomas E. Silverstein, Adolph Reynosa, Clayton A. Fountain, and Edgar HevleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Marvin Leo BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- United States v. Guy J. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jerry ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James HerrimanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Michael PriceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.